The Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53

The Suffering Servant

The same god who wrote the new testament wrote the old testament, that’s the way I see it from Isaiah 53. I am a Christian because of the Old Testament, without Isaiah 53, idk whether I could believe the New Testament. How can I be confident if Jesus is the messiah if I don’t have all of the predictions of the OT defining him when he shows up. 

Isaiah 53 addresses Jesus

Arrival

Rejection

Death

Resurrection

Ascension

Coronation

Isaiah 53 explains the gospel more articularly than any chapter in the NT:

1. Arrival and Rejection

v2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot,

    and like a root out of dry ground.

He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,

    nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

We saw nothing special about him. We saw him as a root our of dry ground that we would trip over. There was nothing spectacular because he didn’t fit the cultural expectations of the Messiah, he didn’t fight off the Romans, didn’t create an earthly conquering kingdom and so we considered him as nothing. This is exactly what happened because Israel rejected him and the romans crucified him.

2. Justification:

v5 But he was pierced for our transgressions,

    he was crushed for our iniquities;

the punishment that brought us peace was on him,

    and by his wounds we are healed.

Wow, that sounds like God declaring us righteous on someone else’s account.

3. Resurrection

v8 By oppression and judgement he was taken away.

    Yet who of his generation protested?

For he was cut off from the land of the living;

    for the transgression of my people he was punished

v10 Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer,

    and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin,

he will see his offspring and prolong his days,

    and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.

Jesus life was cut off in v8 but then he will see his offsprings in v10. How does that make sense? If his life was cut off how can he see his offspring? When we die we don’t see our offspring because we are dead. This is in reference to Jesus resurrection 

Zachariah 12:10 They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child

This is repentant sinners will say! We thought he was stricken by God, we thought we were doing the right thing by having him put to death. Now we see he was was bruised for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities! A fountain of salvation is available. 

What’s interesting about Isaiah's prophecy is that he isn’t saying it’s going to happen, he’s saying it has happened, because he was looking past christ to when sinners looked back on the one whom they’ve pierced.

The Future Salvation of Israel

Why is this study important to me? I want scripture to be clear. In Sydney I want God to be most glorified in my life based upon my faithfulness to Scripture.

--------------------------

The plain meaning of a text is always the preferred interpretation. There is never a reason to spiritualize, to allegorize, to try to explain a text away if the plain meaning is clear. Only if the context of a passage gives compelling reason to assume that the language is somehow symbolic or somehow spiritual should you ever look for any other than the obvious meaning. Where the plain sense of Scripture makes good sense, to seek any other sense is nonsense.

Jean Calvin himself states "The error of allegory has been the source of many evils; not only did it open the way for adulteration of the natural meaning of Scripture, but also set up boldness in allegorizing as the chief exegetical virtue.” 

----------------------------

Amillennialists believe there will be no future earthly kingdom, no future salvation of Israel and Christ will not physically reign on the earth. Christ will just come when it's time for him. The Church has replaced Israel for special privileges. The Church is the Kingdom that is prophesied.

Postmillennialists believe there will be some sort of kingdom on earth, not a literal 1000 years (which is not millennium which means a thousand). The kingdom will exist but Christ won't come until it's over. Christ will not physically reign on Earth. 

This is called replacement theology. However, this is in contrast to scripture. If we were to read scripture in plain text we would become Premillennialists.  

Premillennialist: A one thousand-year reign of Christ on the earth, there will be the fulfilment of all God’s promises to Israel in the past given through the Abrahamic covenant, Davidic covenant, and new covenant. And all of God’s people, not just Israel, but all of God’s people through history, including the redeemed church and the redeemed in the time of the tribulation to come, will all enjoy the blessings of that glorious reign.

If this kingdom is described so clearly in the book of Revelation, along with the salvation of Israel necessarily since a 144,000 Jews in the future will preach the gospel, and since there will be a great awakening in the city of Jerusalem where the whole population will give glory to God as Revelation 11 describes it, if that is what Scripture says so clearly and if the promises of God are unilateral, unconditional and irrevocable, where do the different views come from?

Luke 20 is a story about Israel’s history. Israel is God’s vineyard. That is to say, God chose them to be His special people, to receive His revelation, to be stewards of the covenants and the Scriptures and all divine truth. And God put over them certain leaders, those leaders – the priests, even the kings, the elders – all of those who are responsible to bring leadership to that people with a view toward producing, or seeing produced in them, fruit unto righteousness, which then could be offered to God in an expression of worship and praise.

Some people look at Luke 20 and interpret that God will cancel his promises to Israel and give the Vineyard to others, which is the gentiles/church. This is a misreading. God said he will give his privileges to others, but who are the others? Matthew 21:43 in Jesus telling of the story, He says, “The kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a nation,” – or a people – “bringing forth the fruit of it.” So the vineyard is the kingdom of God. It is the sphere where God works. It is the sphere of God’s kingdom. It is the sphere in which God is working His salvation. And the first group of people who could be called God’s vineyard, or God’s kingdom, were the Jews. It was the Jews who were so privileged. Their leaders were false. Their leaders did not lead them into righteousness, they themselves were rebellious as well. So God will carve out a new people with new leaders, a new people with new leaders.

-------------

What does scripture say?

The new leaders were being formed. The first generation of those new leaders is the apostles. They were given, as Matthew 16 says, the keys to the kingdom. They were given the gospel and the gospel truth to open the doors to salvation. The new stewards then are the apostles. The apostles are the new vinegrowers. Under their leadership the kingdom of God has moved from being predominantly Jewish to being predominantly Gentile. Acts 13:46 Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, ‘It was necessary that the Word of God should be spoken to you first;” – because you were God’s original chosen nation – “since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles. Clearly the Church now extends to the nations, this cannot be denied. The special privileges are no longer held by the Jews

So now we have to ask, is this permanent? Amillennialists and Postmillennialists will say yes. However scripture says no. Scripture says a transition has taken place. The leaders of Jerusalem aren't the leaders of God's vineyard no more. So is this permanent or temporary? Romans 11:25 says a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, when all who have been chosen, all who have been appointed unto eternal life. This partial hardening of Israel only happens until the Church is complete then all of Israel will be saved. In plain text, this is what scripture says. In verse 28 they are enemies for your sake. Because they rejected, the gospel came to us. But from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers, for the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable. Paul tells us that God doesn't go back on His word "calling of God are irrevocable".

Zechariah 8:1, “Then the word of the Lord of hosts came, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord of hosts, “I’m exceedingly jealous for Zion, I am jealous with great wrath for her. I’m angry jealous.” I will return to Zion and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem. Then Jerusalem will be called the City of Truth, the mountain of the Lord of hosts will be called the Holy Mountain. Then in verse 20, “Peoples will come, nations will come, inhabitants of many cities will come.” This describes the kingdom; they’ll come from all over the world. “They’ll go to one another, saying, ‘Let us go at once to entreat the favor of the Lord, to seek the Lord of hosts; I will also go.’ So many peoples and mighty nations will come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem and entreat the favor of the Lord.” And finally in verse 23, “Thus says the Lord of hosts, ‘In those days ten men from all the nations will hang on the garment of a Jew saying, “Let’s go with you, for we have heard that God is with you.”’ The text is clear, God will come back to Israel, save Israel, dwell in the presence of the people of Israel gathered in the kingdom. This is the future promise of God: unmistakable, unambiguous, and not really arguable from any text of Scripture.

Micah 4:1-2 And it will come about in the last days that the mountain of the house of the Lord will be established as the chief of the mountains. It will be raised above the hills, and the people will stream into it. And many nations will come and say, ‘Come and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob, that He may teach us about His ways and that we may walk in His paths.’ For from Zion will go forth the law, even the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” Jerusalem again, the center of the kingdom of Christ over this whole earth, will be the source of truth; and from it will go the word of the Lord, and from it will go holiness; and He will rule with righteousness and peace over the whole earth.

The Holy Spirit is honored in the mighty work of regeneration of that final nation Israel, that final group of ethnic Jews who, according to Jeremiah 31 and Ezekiel 36 and 37, will be given the Holy Spirit. He is the glorious agent who empowers the final salvation of Israel and leads to the glory of the kingdom.

Is the Old Testament amillennial? No. Were the Jews who read the Torah amillennial? No. Was Jesus ammillennial? No. Where the apostles amillennial? No.

We cannot find replacement theology in the Old Testament. We cannot find Jesus or any New Testament writer preaching this either. There’s nothing that says that whatever God had once planned for Israel is permanently cancelled. Nothing says that. There’s nothing that cancels the future earthly reign of Jesus Christ in favour of some spiritual reign from heaven (which is was amillennials preach). 

Amillennials believe that not all Israel is Israel. The Israel of God simply means genuine Jewish believers. And there are in the church many genuine Jewish believers. In fact, when the church began in Jerusalem and three thousand were saved. But even when the gospel was taken to the Gentile world they went, first of all, to the synagogue and preached the gospel to the Jews. So where did the amillennial and postmillennial beliefs come from? It was after the Bible was written. 

In early Christian history the early church fathers preached Premillenialism. For example Papias who lived while John was still alive. Papias says there will be a millennium after the ressurection of the dead when the personal reign of Christ is established on Earth. The great historian Philip Schaff looked at Pre-nicene fathers (325AD and before) The most striking point in the eschatology of the Ante-Nicene Age is the prominent millenarianism; that is the belief of a visible reign of Christ in glory on earth with the risen saints for a thousand years before the general resurrection and the judgment. It is the widely-held opinion of distinguished teachers such as Barnabas, Papias, Justin, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Methodius, Lactantius etc. They couldn’t believe anything else because the Bible was clear: there would be a kingdom. Many Church fathers who interpreted scripture came to the same conclusion. Unless we change the meaning of Israel to mean something (which in scripture is simple and straight forward language) we cant have the Church replacing Israel. Other well respected Christians such as Justin Marture, Origen and even Augustine sought to replace Israel with the Church. This could be due to a growing resentment towards Jews since they rejected Jesus.

-------------------------

Replacement theology has a damaging effect to Jewish evangelism. 

If we were Amillenialists we would be in a dilemma. Why is this? Regarding the theology towards God's promises to Israel in the Old Testament Jews still hold onto the fact that God does not go back on His word. If we were to say that the Kingdom has already come through the Church. A Jew would reply "you mean to say the Messiah came and established His kingdom and this is it? This is the kingdom that God promised us? In what sense does righteousness prevail? In what sense does peace prevail in the world? Where is the son of David reigning on the throne? Where is truth and holiness? All the promises were given to us so where is the kingdom???? Jews are being killed every day, and hated, and Israel is under siege? What about God's promises? What about His covenants? Are you to say that the Old Testament isn't true? If God can't be trusted for His promises to Jews why should He be trusted regarding His promises to the Church? God does not ever go back on His word in the Old Testament. Therefore Jesus cannot be the Messiah because you claim he is God and yet he removes the Old Testament promises and covenants."

However if we were Premillenialists our argument would be much more reasonable. 

They would ask, "If Jesus is your Messiah where is your Kingdom". We Premillenialists would refer to Zechariah 8. "The Kingdom is waiting for you to look at Jesus your Messiah and embrace him as your true Saviour. God has kept His Old Testament promises. Gentiles will want you to take them to the mountain of the Lord to hear the truth of Jesus. But you will never have that kingdom until you've embraced the King". This in comparison to the Amillenialists is much more reasonable.

We can even transfer them to Isaiah 53. He was wounded for your transgressions and bruised for your iniquities, and the chastisement producing your peace with God was placed on Him

John Macarthur - Why Does God Allow So Much Suffering and Evil?

God wills evil to exist.

Evil is everywhere yet God is absolutely sovereign. He  is in charge of everything, He created everything out of nothing and He will consummate everything. He governs history in every minut detail. In Genesis God drowned millions of people and took responsibility for it. God is content to make it clear that he is sovereign over everything. 

We cannot conclude that God exists as sovereign and yet not allow evil to exist.

Deuteronomy 32:29

See now that I myself am he!

There is no god besides me.

I put to death and I bring to life,

I have wounded and I will heal,

and no one can deliver out of my hand.

Exodus 4:11, “The Lord said to him” – that was to Moses – “Who made man’s mouth? Who makes him mute or deaf or seeing or blind? Is it not I, the Lord?” 

Psalm 105:16, “God called for a famine on the land.” 

Second Kings 17:25, “They didn't fear the Lord. Therefore, the Lord sent lions which killed some of them.” 

Lamentations 3:37-38, “Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that both good and ill come forth?

How anybody could miss the fact that God exists as sovereign and allows evil, especially if you read the book of Genesis and read about the Flood. God allows evil and personally takes responsibility for its existence. God is Holy, He can't do evil, He can't look upon evil positively. He's incapable of doing anything evil. He is Holy Holy Holy, but He's content to leave the responsibility for evils existence and its consequences with Himself. 

Isaiah 45:5. “I am the Lord, there is no other; beside Me there is no God. I will gird you though you have not known Me, that men may know from the rising to the setting of the sun, there is no one besides Me. I am the Lord, there is no other; the one forming light and creating darkness, causing well-being and creating calamity. I am the Lord who does all these.”

Evil is a deprivation. It is not something God created. It is something that reflects rebellion against who God is and what He's created. So how do we get to the issue of how evil can exist and God maintain His goodness? God is all-knowing. God is all-powerful. Evil exists. God willed evil to exist but He didn't create it. That would be impossible for Him, as it is impossible for Him to do any evil because He cannot contradict His nature. But God wills that it exists.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Romans 3:5 Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God.

Our unrighteousness – our sin, our falleness, our inequity, our corruption, our wretchedness puts the righteousness of God on display. That reality is shown on the cross where the full manifestation of the righteousness of God displayed, as He punishes the Holy, harmless, undefiled Son, for our sins, to satisfy His righteousness. Romans 10, Paul says the Jews have a problem. They do not understand the righteousness of God. What does Paul mean by that? The Jews don't know how righteous God is. How is that reflected? They attempt to establish their own righteousness. They think the righteousness of God is attainable to them. In other words they think God is less righteous than He is and they are more righteous than they are, and so they can earn acceptance from God and meet His standard. They don't understand that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness.

You never will understand how righteous God is until you go to the cross. And you will see there that as loving and gracious and merciful as God is, as eager and willing as He is to forgive the sinner, He still has to carry out infinite punishment on a substitute to deal with His righteousness.

But what was on display at the cross was the righteousness of God in the necessity of pouring out an infinite punishment on an infinite person (Christ) who therefore had an infinite capacity to absorb it all in three hours, which all the unsaved who end in hell will never be able to absorb in eternity. This puts the righteousness of God on display. We would never see the seriousness of sin and the majesty of Gods righteousness if we didn't see the cross. We’d never see the cross if there were no sin. So to demonstrate His righteousness, He would allow sin to exist. But look at Romans 9. Just a couple of comments. Verse 22, “What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath, and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? And He did so in order that He might make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory.” God puts His righteousness on display by the way He confronts and deals with sin. 

So, in Romans 3:5, Paul says that God demonstrates His righteousness in response to our unrighteousness. In Romans 5:8, he says that “God demonstrates His love toward us in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” God demonstrates two things. He demonstrates His wrath and His mercy. God gets glory from His wrath. God gets glory from His judgment. We wouldn't know what wrath was, and we wouldn't know what mercy was if there were no sin.

SO WHY DOES GOD ALLOW SUFFERING AND EVIL?

Luckily for us, the answer is not newly discovered. It has been revealed in scripture as well been taught all throughout Church history. The Westminster Confession says it best.

Westminster Confession, 1646

“God, from all eternity, did by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass” – yet, so - “as thereby, neither is God the author of sin nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures. Nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away. Sinfulness proceeds only from the creature and not from God who, being most holy and righteous, neither can be the author and approver of sin.”

“All that God decrees and providentially brings to pass, is all to the praise of his glory. Therefore, the existence of evil is, in the end, to the praise of his glory.”

THE ANSWER

The reason God ordained evil is for His own glory. Simple question. Is God made more glorious because evil exists, or is He made less glorious because evil exists? The answer: God is made infinitely more glorious because evil exists. We would not know the good news without the bad news. We would not know the goodness of God without knowing the evilness of Sin. God has absolute integrity. He is glorious because evil exists and we praise God because of what He has done to overcome evil. 

R.C. Sproul: Can We Enjoy Heaven Knowing of Loved Ones in Hell

Romans 8:23-30

The purpose of predestination is that be conformed to the image of Christ. We are elected in Christ, for Christ, to end up in conformity to Christ. 

Three reasons why we worry now about our future happiness if we discover that friends, relatives or maybe even spouses aren't there. It's because we don't understand these three things: 

1. We don't know who God is.  
We don't know and can never comprehend what is means that God is Holy. Holiness is so foreign to our experience that we have almost no grasp on the character and the nature of God. We are so baffled by His holiness, that we can catch ourselves trippin and consider His holiness offensive. This is due to a lack of scriptural study and expository preaching. 

2. We don't know who we are.
We fail to grasp about ourselves of the heinousness and incomprehensibly evil nature of sin. Sin is a regular part of the human experience, it's natural to us. It is in our nature. Psalm 51:5 Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me. this is so much a part of our nature that we'll say "To sin is human, to forgive is divine. Since sinning is part of being human, then God is obliged to forgive us, He is understanding!" WE DO NOT KNOW WHO WE ARE. 

3. We don't know what Glorification means.

When we think about heaven, what provokes our thinking? What do we look forward to? What does it offer us? What we should be looking forward to is a complete and eternal absence of sin. In the High Priestly prayer (John 17), Jesus prayed about glorification. He prayed about His Father being glorified, exalted, honoured, being treated accordingly to His glory. Jesus even prayed for Himself that He'll have the glory that He had with His father from the beginning restored to Him after His earthly humiliation. But it's not just that the Father and Son will be glorified but that the final chapter in our redemption will be our own glorification (not the same as exaltation, we can't be raised to the same deity as God). Glorification is the finalisation and consummation of our sanctification. When we're saved God is at work within us shaping, molding, conforming us to the image of Christ. That work will not be finished until our sanctification is perfected. 

Between sinners and God is a great separation/chasm that separates the righteousness of Christ from sinners. All the advances in sanctification we can make whether it would to be serving in Church or evangelising would not make us much closer/farther to God than the worst of sinners. While Christians are being sanctified and the unrepentant are doomed for hell, the difference between them in terms of distance from God is negligible. There's still a huge distance between us and sinless Jesus. Monstrous sinners we can relate to, not God.  However when we're glorified God counts us as approachable to Himself. We are no longer with sin, and are conformed to the character of our saviour.  Until our glorification, our thoughts and ambitions have far more in common with the worst of sinners than we do with the glory and exaltation of Christ. Once sin is removed from our life we'll be able to love God with our everything, our affection and attention would be undivided toward to God's holiness. 

It's hard to imagine for us to enjoy heaven without loved ones because we find it hard to imagine life without sin. Sin being as self centred as loving people created by God more than God Himself. God demands that He be regarded as Holy. The righteousness of God, the manifestation of His holiness, scripture tells me that one day  I'll be so consumed in the glory of God that I will rejoice in His judgement of the unjust. We're not there yet, but for us Christians, that is our destiny. 

Examine yourself - Paul Washer

The West have combined two doctrines but we've lost both of them even though they're very important doctrines in the Christian Faith. 

1. Doctrine of Security - that every person who believes in Jesus are secure in salvation 
2. Doctrine of Assurance - how we can be assured that we're true believers.

A wrong interpretation of these doctrines is that if we can make a decision to be saved but when we stop walking with God we then lose our salvation. A proper view of these doctrines is that we know we have security and be assured of salvation not because we repented, but because we are continuing to repent today and even to a greater degree. being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus - Philippians 1:6. Heaven and hell, eternity and death may not be a reality to you but it is to Saint Paul. 

In 2 Corinthians 13:5 Paul came to a Church with carnal members. He doesn't bring them assurance by referring them to their conversion story but by going to the present tense, Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realise that Christ Jesus is in you—unless, of course, you fail the test? A person who walks in the faith for many years may come to eventually backslide into fellowship and indulgence with carnal impulses. We need to stop assuring them that they are a Christian. Instead we should say "You've made convincing declarations that you are a true believer, but now you're beginning to live like God never gave you a law to begin with, It's very possible that you never knew Him from the beginning. Up until this point you've deceived yourself and us with your works of the flesh because if a work of God does not continue, it was never His to begin with."

Do not listen to your heart. Listen to the Word of God. Do not listen to what your father says about your salvation, do not listen to what your mother says about your salvation. Listen to the word of God. Compare what you know of scripture to your secret life, what you do behind close doors. So many young people have their parents deceived because externally we conform to their law. But it's not our law if it's not in our heart. We cannot fool God. 

In the book of John, all the writings of the word "light" is referred to as holiness, righteousness. God is a Holy God, no sin, no flaw, no spec of immorality. John deals with false teachers who claim that God is a very dark hidden figure, that knowledge about God is esoteric and only some people can know it. John contradicts this. He writes that God is light, God has revealed to use who he is and his will, he's made it clear.  Does mainstream media believe this? Is this the politicians God? It's the type of God they can pray to but not define who he is publicly. The God they can talk about in a political speech but cannot define what his will is. This god is good for them because they're no longer accountable. God has revealed himself, and he has revealed his standards for the Christian walk.

Throughout Church history there's always been those who believe Christians can achieve sinless perfection, or sinless perfection is the only way to be a Christian. The bible doesn't teach this. The bible teaches that the most mature and godly Christians is still susceptible to sin. This is what this means: one of the greatest evidences that a person has truly been born again is that they will be sensitive to sin in their life, they will be broken by their guilt and led to repentance and confession of that sin. When was the last time i wept over my sin.

Those who are stubborn in heart, who are not sensitive to sin. We might not know them personally but we don't need to, we know the word of God. We know God's standards. 1 John 1:8. If we do not have a new relationship with sin, we do not have a new relationship with God. If we do not have a new relationship with His commands, His word, we do not have a relationship with Him.

Romans 12:1-2 Elements of a living Sacrafice (John Macarthur)

I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

4 elements in being a living sacrifice

1. Soul
2. Body
3. Mind
4. Will

SOUL

• First of all, you cannot please God in any way if you don't give yourself to Him, your soul, the essence of who you are.  That’s the foundation of the sacrifice.  It all starts with the soul.
• Now, any time you see “therefore,” you know that this is simply a transition into the consequence of what has been established before. For 11 chapters, the apostle Paul has been delineating the mercies of God.  We’re not talking about “mercy” singular.  We’re talking about “mercies.” Things given undeserved. That’s “mercy” – things that are presented to us, granted to us, applied to us, credited to us, which we do not deserve.  There are many mercies of God.

BODY

• “Present” is a temple term.  It means to surrender up, to yield up, to offer up, and that is to hold nothing back.  Like a priest who brings a sacrifice and lays the whole thing on the altar, you put your body on the altar, and by doing that, you are saying, “I give You, God, my body.” 
• if you look back at chapter 6 for just a moment, Paul says in verse 12 of chapter 6, “Do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts.”  So you there that the body means more than just the material.  It means the immaterial desires and lust, as well, but he says in verse 12, “Do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey its lust,” verse 13, then, “Do not go on presenting,” there’s that same verb, “the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness, but presents yourselves to God...,” and he’s talking about the body and the component parts of your humanity.
• Romans 6:16  “Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness?”  In other words, you're making a presentation of yourself to obey your master.
• Sanctification is the result of an active presentation of the soul first and then the body to God. 
• In your salvation, you declared God as your sovereign, Christ as your Lord and Master, and this is your responsibility, then, to come to worship Him and to offer yourself as a living sacrifice.

MIND

• If you're not going to give your mind to God, obviously you're not going to be able to sustain giving your body to God. Along with the body, the mind must come. 
• If you don't program your mind correctly, your body will come off that altar (presentable sacrifice to God).  This is reality.  The mind is critical.  So how do we deal with the mind?  Negative.  Don't be conformed to this age. What is the this age?, the fallen world, all unbiblical philosophies which Satan uses to promote his goals and ambitions.

WILL 

• Finally, the will must be given to God.  We know things, but we don't necessarily do what we should.  Paul says, “I don't do what I should do.  I do what I don’t want to do.”  The will is a very important reality.  The final word, then, is that you would prove, by your life, what the will of God is – prove not in the sense that you validate God but in the sense that you demonstrate it.  You demonstrate the will of God.  You put the will of God on display because you do His will.
• to live the Christian life is a strong, strong desire generated by the will based upon what the mind knows of the Word of God which informs what the body does, all in gratitude for the mercies of God granted graciously to us in Christ.  This is the sum and substance of the path of sanctification.  There’s no other way to get there